[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A56D6B3.7030201@banquise.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:50:43 +0200
From: Simon Marechal <simon@...quise.net>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: latest john and all patch included
Solar Designer a écrit :
> Basically, the question is - should someone be putting out pre-patched
> trees for the dummies? If so, what patches should be included in those?
> I'd imagine that if the jumbo patch is properly maintained, then it
> should be just that one, which kind of makes this tree redundant - or do
> we really care about the dummies all that much? ;-) Yes, I'm not being
> politically-correct. ;-)
Everybody does download my myjohn.tgz tree, and nobody wants the
patches. It is not just the dummy, it is also for the lazy, and the
lazys are numerous in computer security :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
