[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081019015341.GA25952@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:53:41 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fast freebsd MD5 implementation
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Simon Marechal wrote:
> And for more spam, this adds an ICC target
>
> http://btb.banquise.net/bin/john-1.7.3.1-all-5-fastMD5.3.diff.gz
I compiled this on linux-x86-64 with gcc 4.3.1 after some trivial
changes (patch attached).
> gcc:
> Benchmarking: FreeBSD MD5 [12x]... DONE
> Raw: 2640 c/s real, 2613 c/s virtual
What version of gcc is that? I am not getting results this poor on
x86-64 with gcc 4.3.1. Indeed, it is possible that gcc's shortcomings
manifest themselves in a worse way when fewer registers are available.
> icc:
> Benchmarking: FreeBSD MD5 [12x]... DONE
> Raw: 10380 c/s real, 10380 c/s virtual
Here's what I am getting:
Athlon 64 3000+ 2.0 GHz
old code: 8970 c/s
4x: 7060
8x: 4500
12x: 5100
16x: 5100
20x: 5020
Q6600 2.4 GHz (one core):
old code: 10200 c/s
4x: 14844
8x: 9592
12x: 9374
16x: 3200
20x: 3100
So even with gcc there's an improvement on Core 2, but only when no
extra parallelism is introduced (beyond "one instance" of SSE2).
This time all 5 builds actually crack all of my 120 test hashes.
Thanks,
Alexander
View attachment "john-1.7.3.1-all-5-fastMD5.3-x64.diff" of type "text/plain" (2061 bytes)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
