[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4255c2570703220941x9f80c14g1a8031171b398fd0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:41:46 -0500
From: RB <aoz.syn@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: PVM or MPI?
Not being in the HPC crowd, I personally can't see much of a
difference - they're two implementations of one parallelization
paradigm: thread concurrency on heterogeneous machines. There [was]
an MPI implementation of John during the 1.6.x days, and it worked
okay - I used it to some success on an 8-way P-III machine. Looking
around, it seems they've updated it:
http://www.bindshell.net/tools/johntheripper.
I think the first step would be a good-according-to-Solar
parallelization of John's algorithm in the first place, and worry
about distributing that work off-machine later. For that matter,
when/if that comes down the pipes, it should make hardware [FPGA]
acceleration easier too.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
