[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070208194003.GA27171@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:40:03 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New NT patch
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:02:23PM -0800, Alain Espinosa wrote:
> Revision #4
>
> - This revision (I thinks) works for little-endian and big-endian
> architecture. Please someone that have a computer based on big-endian
> architecture test it. I test with little-endian.
I've briefly tested this (with only the self-test) on:
Linux/x86 (Owl 1.1+, gcc 2.95.3)
Linux/x86-64 (Owl 2.0+, gcc 3.4.5)
Linux/alpha (Owl 1.1, gcc 2.95.3)
Linux/sparc (Owl 2.0, gcc 3.4.5)
NetBSD/sparc64 (NetBSD 3.0, gcc 3.3.3)
The last two are big-endian, and this covers all four combinations of
32/64-bitness and endianness, as well as architectures with strict
alignment requirements. The patch works fine.
I've placed this revision of the patch (with the lost Makefile hunk
re-added by me) into:
ftp://ftp.openwall.com/pub/projects/john/contrib/
and moved the previous revision to under the historical/ subdirectory.
I might also link to it from the website, as I think that this patch
obsoletes Olle Segerdahl's older one.
Thanks!
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: 5B341F15 fp: B3FB 63F4 D7A3 BCCC 6F6E FC55 A2FC 027C 5B34 1F15
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
