[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070203114723.GA31239@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 14:47:23 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Mac OS X 10.4 Hashes..
> Solar Designer <solar@...> writes:
> > Apparently, this one works for salted SHA-1 hashes as used on OS X:
> >
> > http://fsbsoftware.com/john-1.7-saltsha1.diff
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:30:27PM +0000, Matt D. wrote:
> Does anyone know of an update to this patch for support in Linux?
I did not. But I've just made one for you - it's attached (to be
applied on top of the above patch). The problem was not with Linux vs.
OS X, but rather with the original patch not supporting little-endian
architectures such as x86. It worked on Linux/SPARC just fine, which
I've used to identify where things went wrong on x86. It is likely that
64-bit architectures will require even further fixups to this patch; I
haven't bothered to test that yet.
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: 5B341F15 fp: B3FB 63F4 D7A3 BCCC 6F6E FC55 A2FC 027C 5B34 1F15
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Was I helpful? Please give your feedback here: http://rate.affero.net/solar
View attachment "john-1.7-saltsha1-endianness-fixup.diff" of type "text/plain" (1028 bytes)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
