|
Message-ID: <1160658875.452e3fbb4e195@imp4-g19.free.fr> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:14:35 +0200 From: Guillaume Arcas <guillaume.arcas@...e.fr> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Question about hashes Hi. My question may sound strange : what is the "faster-or-easier-to-crack-by-john" hash ? Here the stuff : I have some cleartext stored passwords (please don't ask me why or how, it's not my choice !) that I would like to audit using John. These passwords are stored in cleartext by a kind of Password Vault software. The thing is to audit these passwords automatically. What I do for now is create a Unix-like password file using Perl. I then can run JtR against the Unix hashes. So I just wonder if there is a more easier or faster cracked hash format to choose so my audits run take less time. Hope I was clear enough... Regards. Guillaume Arcas - [http://yom.retiaire.org] ----------------------------------------------------------- "Je cherche un ailleurs, mais pas trop loin d'ici." (Sempé) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.