[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060531031058.GA2292@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:10:58 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallalizing John the Ripper - performance measurement?
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:47:05AM +0200, Otheus (aka Timothy J. Shelling) wrote:
> Since my hack involves every MPI task creating its own record file, would
> using john's --status mode report on the cracks per second for just that
> task?
Yes, it should - unless your patch breaks that functionality somehow. ;-)
> If so, If I can use --status to accurately measure the performance of
> each MPI task, then I have a very easy way of measuring overall performance.
Yes, but you have to add those numbers up manually.
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
