[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2306.84.188.252.232.1146180551.squirrel@www.jpberlin.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:29:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: sebastian.rother@...erlin.de
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
> This makes sense - and John has been doing that kind of thing in
> "generic" and 32-bit SPARC builds. But this approach also has several
> disadvantages. Most likely, I'll leave it for "generic" only in the
> next official release.
Why?
>> You may benchmarked it on AMD CPUs but also on AMD64-base CPUs?
>
> I've benchmarked the 32-bit-with-SSE code (effectively 128-bit) on
> 32-bit and 64-bit AMD CPUs. They behaved almost the same.
What`s about 64Bit SSE....?
*cut*
Ok... I hope you`ll paste the CPU-types :-)
Kind regards,
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
