[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060405212707.590855.13c4cc5e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:27:07 +0200
From: "websiteaccess@...il.com" <websiteaccess@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Challenge : some results
Le Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:32:20 +0400, Solar Designer a écrit:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:08:05PM +0200, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote:
>> Katelyn:
>> PASSLIST : Challenge.txt
>> WORDLIST SIZE : 4,893,366 words
>> DECRYPTED : 192
>> TIME : 78 minutes
>>
>> Website :
>> PASSLIST : Challenge.txt
>> WORDLIST SIZE : 72,343 words
>> DECRYPTED : 255
>> TIME : 95 minutes
>
> I don't know what Katelyn and Website mean or why you're posting this,
> but you can further improve your results by simply picking the 255
> cracked passwords and placing them into a 255-entry "wordlist". ;-)
>
Well, If you don't have a supercomputer and not 15 years before you,
how crack maximum passwords ???
-> have a very good short wordlist and some highly optimized rules.
As you can see, more 4 millions words are not more effective than only
72 000 specialized words.
Less words = less time to crack , no ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
