|
Message-ID: <BAY13-F1682A62D9B07D7E434D30BB1E20@phx.gbl> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:16:53 +0000 From: "hadzijj qwerty" <hadzijj@...mail.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: does john crack xp passwords correctly? >On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:46:04AM +0000, hadzijj qwerty wrote: > > In the meantime I found another thing that I'd like to ask about. You >wrote > > about letter "M" that john didn't check if it's lower or upper-case. So > > when it will finish looking for the first 7 chars of my password will >their > > case be unknown as well? > >Yes. The case of characters is unimportant for determining whether a >given Windows password is weak or not. > >However, if you're cracking those passwords for another purpose, you may >apply the unofficial NTLM hashes support patch to John, then have it >guess the proper case of characters in passwords it would have cracked >based on LM hashes. > >JtR 1.7 includes the following hack in the default john.conf: [..] Thanks. > > $ dpkg -l | grep john > > ii john 1.6-39 active > > password cracking tool > > > > It looks that my debian would like to argue with you :) > >No, everything is in agreement now. You've been using version 1.6-39 of >the Debian package (which is Debian's 39th revision of the package of >John 1.6), not John version 1.6.39. Those two are entirely different >versions. I haven't known that :) Thanks a lot, Hadzij _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.