[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060225032238.GA2046@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:22:38 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: jumbo pure win32 build
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:04:19AM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> Well, it managed to compile it without any problems with MinGW under
> pure DOS command box (WinXP, *NOT* cygwin!), it passed benchmark tests,
> it even cracked some passwords. But, uhm, I don't know if it really
> works. I really don't :>
The patch is rather small. :-)
You had to drop the support for "Idle = Y" - any chance you would
implement it with native Win32 calls?
Also, you're assuming that CLK_TCK and CLOCKS_PER_SEC are the same -
which does not have to be the case (although it may be the case for
current MinGW if you say that the benchmark works right).
Thanks,
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
