[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050911180706.GA1180@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:07:06 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 2 Qs on john1.6 (stable)
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:53:11AM +0200, Christian Karpp wrote:
> Solar Designer wrote:
> >You might get around this by reducing the compiler's optimization level
> >(e.g., replace the -O2 with -O1) for all or for some source files (you
> >can compile DES_std.c into DES_std.o invoking cc manually).
>
> Good hint. Unfortunately I have to skip optimization completely under
> AIX 5.3 for BSDI DES (x725), Kerberos AFS DES and NT LM DES in order for
> the benchmark not to fail. The results however are dramatically lower
> than with optimization - on all tests. Pity.
Well, perhaps you can complain to xlC developers?
> BTW, I've used john-1.6.38 this time...
With that version, NT LM DES shouldn't be failing anymore even when
DES_std.c is miscompiled.
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Was I helpful? Please give your feedback here: http://rate.affero.net/solar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
