[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbr5B=H6FxwUQ+BN0t8d5UHd0x+ohguZgbs25B8C4k9j9KJpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:11:20 +0300
From: Elijah SmarTeam <smarteam.support@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: USB-FPGA development
Jens, can you please make a little clarification on how this speed can
corelate to test for hashcat on GPU? Are those numbers "simply comparable"
or there is smth to take in consideration? There is a benchmark data from
Jeremy <https://gist.github.com/epixoip/6ee29d5d626bd8dfe671a2d8f188b77b> and
according to it the speed for 1080 GTX FE is around 900 MH/s for hashcat's
descrypt. So does this mean that this "40W max" 1.15y device performance
for crypt(3) is almost like 77% of one of the top GPU available?
On 7 November 2016 at 19:57, atom <atom@...hcat.net> wrote:
> Here's some result after running for 2 days on a single hash:
>
> 0g 2:17:04:07 7.35% (ETA: 2016-12-11 22:04) 0g/s 2081Mp/s 2081Mc/s
> 2081MC/s aaa;o7}r..ae\;o7}r
>
> That's around 693MH/s
>
> --
> atom
>
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
