[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28eca46357e384caf2104e8c3b2f0fb2@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:05:29 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: True Crypt, CipherShed, VeraCrypt
On 2015-12-31 16:34, Rich Rumble wrote:
> It appears there are some fundamental differences in the forks of
> TrueCrypt. Specifically VeraCrypt appears to be doing key derivation
> in a "more secure" fashion than TC or CipherShed. Will the
> truecrypt2john and the code that cracks those volumes need to be
> changed?
> https://forum.truecrypt.ch/t/veracrypt-or-ciphershed/449/10
> Will that spawn a new format/tool, veracrypt2john --format=veracode ?
> I'll try to add some samples if I have some time today.
I added a GitHub issue
https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/2012 for this.
Other than that I have no idea and no plans on working on it myself.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
