|
Message-Id: <12A8F688-8D57-4A27-BA84-2A36D0AB10CF@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:05:06 -0700 From: Fred Wang <waffle.contest@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Judy array On Sep 20, 2015, at 12:28 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > Can you give the current JtR (in magnum's repo on GitHub) a try? > We need to figure out the number of cracks discrepancy. I am getting > 1709703 in all of these tests, so I don't know why you only got > 1481414. (We'll also need to figure out the smaller 1710650 vs. 1709703 > discrepancy later.) Cloned, and built clean. I still don't see the same answers as you. ./john --format=raw-md5 --wordlist=/big/words/10m.pass --rules=best64 --pot=foo.pot 29m.txt wc -l foo.pot 1793671 ./john --format=raw-md5 --pot=foo.pot --show 29m.txt >29m.res tail -2 29m.res 1707727 password hashes cracked, 27304531 left I've put foo.pot and 29m.res in a 7z archive for you: https://www.sendspace.com/file/qty8vd > > Also, why do you only go for up to 32 threads? 2x E5-2680v2 has 40 > hardware threads (10 physical cores per CPU chip). How many are seen in > /proc/cpuinfo for you? I used 32 threads on our 2x E5-2670v1 because > these are older v1 chips here. Because I was using an AWS instance, so I could have a completely idle environment to test in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.