[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55FC2DBD.8050109@mailbox.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:29:01 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bitmap & hash table prefetching
On 09/18/2015 04:50 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> The attached patch does that, and it assumes that "binary" itself is
> allocated right after the tiny struct, so doesn't need to be prefetched
> separately. This should be suitable for commit now.
>
> The 29M testcase:
>
> real 0m40.821s
> user 2m55.786s
> sys 0m14.104s
I think as long as we have unresolved new bugs that prevent reliably
cracking hashes, further performance optimization doesn't make that much
sense.
See https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1769
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
