[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <635DF877-0685-46E2-B248-92DCE90A3013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:53:20 -0700
From: Fred Wang <waffle.contest@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: larger bitmaps and hash tables
On Sep 18, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> I would also like to give Fred a chance to contribute Judy before we
> would have invested much time into a hash table rework. So adjusting
> the bitmap sizes is fine to be done now, but changing how the bitmap and
> hash table interact might be premature. I suspect that having a full
> 32-bit partial hash easily available would be beneficial for possible
> alternatives to hash tables as well. Fred, any comments on this?
You are correct. There is no need for a hash table with Judy, and it will continue to offer long term benefits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
