[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150916230917.GA14491@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:09:17 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: multi-threaded hash table initialization
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:18:41AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> OTOH, maybe the time savings will be greater on even bigger hash lists.
I've just tried with 100M hashes (raw-md5 of numbers 0 to 99999999), and
no. It's 1:18 on that machine either way. For the 29M, benchmarking
just the loading now gives me a little over 21 seconds either way.
Maybe there's an improvement from 21.7 to 21.3 or so, but that's very
little.
I think it's a failed experiment for now. I still think something like
this can be done for a speedup, but not exactly this.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
