[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <054b07f35f5b7ebe878180cbc5e85ab9@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:13:14 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fast hash processing bottlenecks
On 2015-09-16 21:54, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 02:41:10PM -0500, jfoug wrote:
>> On 9/16/2015 2:31 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
>>
>>> A "rules first" mode would help greatly (apply each rule to current
>>> word, then advance to next word; right now, we do it the other way
>>> around, which works better for probability-optimized rulesets and slow
>>> hashes).
>>
>> I would really like a mode like that (especially the ability to choose
>> between depth or breadth first from command line)
>
> Agreed. magnum?
Not unless you at least take a very quick look at prince+rules and tell
me what I did wrong. IIRC it goes from (like) 50 Mp/s to 300 Kp/s.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
