[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e9fae08ada1e8912ab0d2b3e7e792bf@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:37:54 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fast hash processing bottlenecks
On 2015-09-16 21:31, Solar Designer wrote:
> A "rules first" mode would help greatly (apply each rule to current
> word, then advance to next word; right now, we do it the other way
> around, which works better for probability-optimized rulesets and slow
> hashes).
Our current "prince + rules" implementation does that (it has to) and
it's *very* slow - while prince without rules is faster than wordlist
mode. Did I implement it in a bad way?
First or not, I think the rules engine has some low hanging fruit for
you now that you are up to speed ;-)
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
