[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f5d97a9cc5c0783abb99cf30bbe6164@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:53:52 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Judy array
On 2015-09-15 09:29, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 09/15/2015 03:03 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
>> magnum - testing this stuff, I see that pot sync is a major bottleneck.
>> Since this is your feature, you might want to benchmark and optimize it
>> some more, or/and maybe we just want it disabled by default when cracking
>> saltless hashes.
>
> Even with fast salted hashes, it is a problem when you have may be 4
> instances of john running, each with about 2 million hashes, and
> cracking many passwords.
You are using the default SALT_HASH_LOG of 12, right? You load a
thousand times more salts than that number is really good for. Please
try bumping it to 22 for the case of 2 million hashes. This will speed
up things significantly, not just pot sync.
In fact we might want to bump that default a bit (at least in Jumbo). I
think we can't make it variable, that would hurt performance.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
