[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150915193537.GA4279@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:35:37 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Encoding (was: Re: Judy array)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:13:15PM +0200, magnum wrote:
> There was, is and will be pros and cons no matter how we do it.
>
> I now changed the performance-threatening "DefaultInternalEncoding" to
> be disabled by default. That should be a fair compromise. For non-UTF-16
> formats or ASCII-only use, this is practically the same as -enc:raw.
>
> Please try that same test on your slow gear, using a commented-out
> DefaultInternalEncoding instead of supplying -enc:raw. I think/hope it
> will give you the same performance.
Somehow it's even faster now, two new runs with same settings:
real 1m0.588s
user 4m47.656s
sys 0m21.994s
real 1m0.459s
user 4m47.158s
sys 0m21.609s
Same number of passwords cracked as before.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
