[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d569b35a36a5a6e648a55eb8ddbf7382@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:13:15 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Encoding (was: Re: Judy array)
On 2015-09-15 20:41, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:32:06PM +0200, magnum wrote:
> Why is -enc=raw not the default, again? Especially if common wisdom
> appears to be to use it every time unless there's a reason not to.
There was, is and will be pros and cons no matter how we do it.
I now changed the performance-threatening "DefaultInternalEncoding" to
be disabled by default. That should be a fair compromise. For non-UTF-16
formats or ASCII-only use, this is practically the same as -enc:raw.
Please try that same test on your slow gear, using a commented-out
DefaultInternalEncoding instead of supplying -enc:raw. I think/hope it
will give you the same performance.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
