[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F86A42.5070605@mailbox.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:58:10 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Judy array
On 09/15/2015 08:41 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> The post-loading time was only 33 to 36 seconds (it varied a bit across
> the 8 processes), which I think is close to Fred's. But the loading is
> slower. In fact, there's a delay of a few seconds between the "Loaded"
> line and the start of cracking - what's happening there? Reading of the
> wordlist? But IIRC I saw similar delay at that point even with mmap.
With a large list of hashes and a large pot file, you have quite some
time loading hashes plus quite some time comparing against pot file
hashes, even though the log file is showing the "Loaded a total of", the
"Sorting salts, for performance" and "Remaining " lines and so on (until
a "Rule #1:" line, i.e., including the parsing of rules) with a
"0:00:00:00" time stamp.
We should try to fix that.
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
