[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d43807b432c667527f18c8d5e33214b@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:46:56 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: md5crypt mmxput*()
On 2015-09-14 19:44, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:00:01AM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> On 2015-09-08 16:18, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> Benchmarking: md5crypt, crypt(3) $1$ [MD5 128/128 XOP 4x2]... (8xOMP) DONE
>>> Raw: 231680 c/s real, 28923 c/s virtual
>>
>> Code size, eh? This reminded me there is a "#pragma GCC optimize 3" in
>> that file that I always found slightly dubious. We should verify how
>> each format reacts to dropping that.
>>
>> Quick test for now, on bull; Enabled the switch for XOP, dropped that
>> pragma:
>>
>> Benchmarking: md5crypt, crypt(3) $1$ [MD5 128/128 XOP 4x2]... (8xOMP) DONE
>> Raw: 233472 c/s real, 29184 c/s virtual
>
> I think you never committed this change? Since you also confirmed it
> helping on AVX2, I think you should, unless you know of a regression.
> Have you done more testing since?
Yes, but I can't seem to get conclusive results. I guess I should just
commit it.
BTW the total size of simd-intrinsics.o (after stripping) actually
increased. I'm not sure how to get detailed figures (eg. per function or
something?).
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
