[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BB961D62-15F8-4D89-87A4-6314F08E82FC@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:04:21 +0800
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SHA-1 H()
On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:43 PM, Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> What we need for benchmarking is the maximum number of threads supported
>> in hardware on a certain number of CPU cores (on 1 core is OK if you
>> can't reliably use the entire machine's cores). So on POWER8 I guess
>> you'll run 8 threads all locked to one physical CPU core. You should be
>> able to do that with OpenMP env vars (affinity).
>
> I'll post the updated results later.
The format prefix 'pbkdf2-hmac-' is omitted below.
On ARM (2xOMP):
[before]
MD4: 2576 c/s real, 1288 c/s virtual
MD5: 1651 c/s real, 825 c/s virtual
SHA1: 578 c/s real, 290 c/s virtual
[after]
MD4: 2608 c/s real, 1304 c/s virtual
MD5: 1600 c/s real, 803 c/s virtual
SHA1: 501 c/s real, 250 c/s virtual
MD4 becomes a little bit faster; MD5 & SHA1 become slower.
On Power (8xOMP, bound to a single core)
[before]
MD4: 28248 c/s real, 3531 c/s virtual
MD5: 19980 c/s real, 2497 c/s virtual
SHA1: 10593 c/s real, 1322 c/s virtual
[after]
MD4: 31207 c/s real, 3882 c/s virtual
MD5: 19980 c/s real, 2489 c/s virtual
SHA1: 11273 c/s real, 1409 c/s virtual
On Power (1xOMP)
[before]
MD4: 13398 c/s real, 13398 c/s virtual
MD5: 10626 c/s real, 10626 c/s virtual
SHA1: 8533 c/s real, 8533 c/s virtual
[after]
MD4: 14628 c/s real, 14628 c/s virtual
MD5: 10935 c/s real, 10935 c/s virtual
SHA1: 8947 c/s real, 8947 c/s virtual
At least there's no performance drop on Power. BTW, It looks Power's SMT performance is not very impressive.
Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
