|
Message-Id: <EABF8220-BD56-4417-A2FF-481AC446FB76@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:04:57 +0800 From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SHA-1 H() On Sep 2, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > > Lei, will you test/benchmark on NEON and AltiVec once magnum commits the > fixes, please? On AltiVec (4xOMP): [before] pbkdf2-sha1: 35840 c/s real, 8982 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha256: 14194 c/s real, 3566 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha512: 5944 c/s real, 1489 c/s virtual [after] pbkdf2-sha1: 36141 c/s real, 9057 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha256: 14336 c/s real, 3592 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha512: 5936 c/s real, 1498 c/s virtual On NEON (2xOMP): [before] pbkdf2-sha1: 578 c/s real, 289 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha256: 276 c/s real, 138 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha512: 125 c/s real, 62.7 c/s virtual [after] pbkdf2-sha1: 501 c/s real, 250 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha256: 276 c/s real, 138 c/s virtual pbkdf2-sha512: 125 c/s real, 62.7 c/s virtual There's no significant change on Altivec, while SHA1 somehow gets slower on NEON. Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.