[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ac04dec6debcbafc483c8b84c41a899@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:07:48 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: LWS and GWS auto-tuning
On 2015-08-27 01:01, magnum wrote:
> On 2015-08-27 00:41, Solar Designer wrote:
> On 2015-08-26 21:37, Solar Designer wrote:
>> Unfortunately, LWS auto-tuning tries unreasonably high values (like
>> 8192) and sometimes fails totally (results in an error from OpenCL and
>> program abort) for some formats when tested with one or the other
>> OpenCL
>> SDK on "well". Can you look into this, and perhaps commit a fix?
>
> The device actually supports 8192 per the queries, and that's why it is
> tried. This is also seen in our list output:
BTW I can see in your output that you don't run today's changes. A LOT
of the code has got better rigidity against problems during autotune
(error is handled, autotune doesn't go further).
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
