[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07406ea38d092b26bd7b35a3109409b1@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 22:21:31 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: LWS and GWS auto-tuning
On 2015-08-26 21:37, Solar Designer wrote:
> Unfortunately, LWS auto-tuning tries unreasonably high values (like
> 8192) and sometimes fails totally (results in an error from OpenCL and
> program abort) for some formats when tested with one or the other OpenCL
> SDK on "well". Can you look into this, and perhaps commit a fix?
That's odd, can you name a format? This should be impossible since we do
things like:
max_group_size = get_kernel_max_lws(sequential_id, crypt_kernel);
...
for (optimal_work_group = my_work_group = wg_multiple;
(int)my_work_group <= (int)max_group_size;
my_work_group += wg_multiple) {
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
