|
Message-ID: <55DA2749.6020607@mailbox.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:04:25 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: testing every index (Re: more robustness) On 08/23/2015 03:28 PM, Kai Zhao wrote: > Yes. After swap the 5th and 7th, the --test-full could not detect this problem. > Should we commit this change ? > > diff --git a/src/AFS_fmt.c b/src/AFS_fmt.c > index 01bd3ad..3f2507e 100644 > --- a/src/AFS_fmt.c > +++ b/src/AFS_fmt.c > @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ static struct fmt_tests tests[] = { > {"$K4$d9e985b36268f168,01234567", "U*U***U"}, > {"$K4$b9615786dfb53297,longcellname", "longpassword"}, > {"$K4$a8dc8aeaa2c48a97,", ""}, > - {"$K4$dfda85c7619183a2,XXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXX"}, > {"$K4$e3e59de6f1d5eaf4,cell", "password355"}, > {"$K4$b02cc24aefbc865b,", "thisisaverylongpassword"}, > + {"$K4$dfda85c7619183a2,XXXXXXXX", "XXXXXXXX"}, > {NULL} > }; I would love to see your finding documented in a comment, edxplaining why you changed the sequence of tests. Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.