[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8E436652-4A26-4DF8-8910-09AB761F7949@shinnok.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:55:14 +0300
From: Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com>
To: "john-dev@...ts.openwall.com" <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Unix question
Jim,
I think it's the other way around, passing the script as argument to the interpreter should be more robust than the vice-versa.
Shinnok
> On 20 Aug 2015, at 18:29, <jfoug@....net> <jfoug@....net> wrote:
>
> You should probably use the shell method. There will be systems which the she-bang is not right. Also, can you be assured that the scripts will be execute enabled? Using the shell ./script.p[ly] will bypass both of these issues.
>
> ---- Mathieu Laprise <mathlaprise@...il.com> wrote:
>> Is there advantages of using on the shell python ./a.py or perl ./a.pl
>> insteal of directly writing ./a.py or ./a.pl . Does one of the method has
>> more chance to work if we don't know anything about the user system, except
>> that it's a unix one ?
>> Thanks guys!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
