[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5355A7B9-FC09-4709-8EF7-34FDFD5CAFB6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:38:21 +0800
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Formats using non-SIMD SHA2 implementations
On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:28 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
>
> Lei,
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:11:40PM +0800, Lei Zhang wrote:
>> To make it work with OpenMP, I move this array to global scope, and make it large enough (dynamic allocated) to be shared by multi-threads. However, I noticed a minor degradation in performance after this change, from ~41 c/s to ~39 c/s for a non-OpenMP build. This change is not huge, but can be observed consistently.
>
> The above is unclear: have you increased the size of the array (along
> with switching to dynamic allocation) even in non-OpenMP builds? Or has
> the size remained the same, yet performance degraded?
For a non-OpenMP build, the size of the array remains the same; the only change is switching from static to dynamic allocation. Yet this minor degradation is observed.
Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
