[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABtNtWGJW3VH5zCEuNkUK2ut0pXwmWyP37+8P0zYDXbq=gvRsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:06:51 +0800
From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: FMT_OMP_BAD
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> Kai,
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:35:32PM +0800, Kai Zhao wrote:
>> There are some dynamic formats below 4.0 or 7.0. Other than dynamic
>> formats, there are 38 formats below 4.0 and 96 formats below 7.0. They
>> are in the attached .txt file.
>
> The file you attached contains many lines for "Only one salt" benchmarks.
> As I suggested here:
>
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-dev/2015/08/16/17
>
> you should ignore those lines. I suggest that you grep them out,
> although if you're ignoring them even when you see them with your eyes,
> that's fine as well. I just want to make sure you won't base any
> decisions on the "Only one salt" lines.
Thanks for your reminding. I really missed that.
After remove the "Only one salt" lines, there are 19 formats below 4.0,
and 55 formats below 7.0 including the 19 formats. They are in the
attached file.
Thanks,
Kai
View attachment "omp_bad.txt" of type "text/plain" (3378 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
