|
Message-ID: <CAKGDhHUiuAXi2HoiKttZeXAqaug1yMTGPpRROp9WcjoHVK8ZHg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 20:01:31 +0200 From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PHC: Argon2 on GPU 2015-08-14 19:06 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >> ah, In this link is argon2d, it's faster than argon2i because t_cost >> for argon2d is equal to 1, 3 for argon2i > > Sure, but IIRC on other benchmarks you posted there was only a small > difference in performance for 2i at t=3 and 2d at t=1. Also, this > doesn't explain the ~10x worse performance we're seeing for 2i now. where do you see ~10x batter performance than now with the same costs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.