|
Message-ID: <20150814135711.GA26939@openwall.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:57:11 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: auditing our use of FMT_* flags (was: more robustness) On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:52:00PM +0800, Kai Zhao wrote: > Thanks for your advice. How about this ? > > static struct fmt_tests tests[] = { > +/* > + * The following two test vectors: "USER" and "service" are case-insensitive > + */ > {"$V$9AYXUd5LfDy-aj48Vj54P-----", "USER"}, > {"$V$p1UQjRZKulr-Z25g5lJ-------", "service"}, > +/* > + * The following one test vector: "President#44" is case-sensitive > + */ > {"$V$S44zI913bBx-UJrcFSC------D", "President#44"}, > {NULL} > +/* > + * This format supports both case-sensitive and case-insensitive passwords, > + * so this format should set FMT_CASE > + */ > }; This looks good to me. Even better would be to move the third comment to where FMT_CASE is actually set. Thanks! Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.