[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABob6iq+WyAqRSBAQ9ZumBcv+mCFjZsVGwpO1jApxURK=v8c5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:48:32 +0200
From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: PHC: makwa
2015-08-13 21:42 GMT+02:00 Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>:
> I implemented basic version of makwa on CPU (although this is a messy
> version so far)
> and have questions
> PHS calls makwa_hash with pre_hash=1, should I also support pre_hash=0
> and support both sha256 and 512 ? in PHS is makwa_init() with
> hard-coded parameters, support also another parameters?
To make it complete I guess we should support all cases, solar please
correct me if I am wrong.
The question is whether it is feasible to make 2 versions for each sha
function or to "multiplex" them in one format selected by hash
encoding. Personally I would go or the latter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
