[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150729031059.GA28277@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 06:10:59 +0300
From: Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: ztex 1.15y boards, pre-development
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 06:56:42PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote:
> On 27 July 2015 at 18:15, Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 06:02:03PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote:
> > > On 27 July 2015 at 17:49, Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > I tried to write several times and to write more in 1 pack (but not
> > > > both). I get results only in fifth reading. So I removed printf and
> > > > added cycle so:
> > > >
> > > > 5000 times:
> > > > modify sent[]
> > > > write 64 bytes
> > > > read till length == 34 or up to 6 times
> > > > fail if read 6 times
> > > > check results
> > > >
> > > > It does not fail. 5k iteration take 6.1 seconds, so transfer speed is
> > > > 52kb/s. Code attached.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cool! But I have one question: did you modify FPGA code? Because internal
> > > FPGA buffer has size of 256 bits which is 32 bytes. Actually, now when I
> > > look at host code, it seems you're writing 32 bytes, right?
> >
> > You're right: Above, I wrote "64 bytes" wrongly. It should be "32
> > bytes". I did not modify fpga code.
> >
> > So the speed is 26kb/s.
> >
>
> I can reproduce the same behavior.
I tried to modify your intraffic.v: I added
SLRD_R <= 1'b1;
into true branch of
if (RESET == 1) begin
This way I get correct results in the first read in the first run. On
the second run and further, it behaves like above: correct results on
5th read.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
