[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKGDhHVJGw22LynPSW4Crj8nZNbhroR-R7x9n7HBjcL15-KKeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:24:22 +0200
From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: PHC: Lyra2 vs yescrypt benchmarks 2
2015-07-26 16:14 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
>> 2015-07-26 15:40 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
>> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 03:15:43PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
>> >> the opposite, seems that Lyra2 is faster with different passwords,
>> >> when I was testing Lyra I forgot to upload bench.c to server,
>>
>> and yescrypt
>
> Oh, so you need to re-do all of these GPU benchmarks with your
> randomizing bench.c?
on super. I had proper bench.c when testing on 960m and now also have
proper bench.c however still I see the difference in this case
none@...e ~/Desktop/rrr/run $ ./john --test --format=lyra2-opencl --v=4
Benchmarking: Lyra2-opencl [Lyra2 OpenCL (inefficient, development use
only)]... Device 0: GeForce GTX 960M
Options used: -I ./kernels -cl-mad-enable -cl-nv-verbose -D__GPU__
-DDEVICE_INFO=131090 -DDEV_VER_MAJOR=352 -DDEV_VER_MINOR=21
-D_OPENCL_COMPILER -DBINARY_SIZE=256 -DSALT_SIZE=64
memory per hash : 1.50 MB
Calculating best global worksize (GWS); max. 1s single kernel invocation.
gws: 256 491 c/s 491 rounds/s 521.035ms per crypt_all()!
Local worksize (LWS) 64, global worksize (GWS) 256
DONE
Speed for cost 1 (t) of 1, cost 2 (m) of 64, cost 3 (c) of 256, cost 4 (p) of 1
Raw: 506 c/s real, 506 c/s virtual
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
