|
Message-ID: <CAKGDhHWXH4bPscnxdmub7yLmX59xO-SbdXUuS7JB+hHwTQaynw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:02:19 +0200 From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: PHC: Lyra2 vs yescrypt benchmarks 2 2015-07-26 15:58 GMT+02:00 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > Agnieszka, > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 03:40:18PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 03:15:43PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote: >> > I was thinking that it uses AVX2 becaues Lyra2 uses >> > blake2b which has some instructions in SSE4_1 >> >> Huh?! Do you understand how SSE2, SSE4.1, AVX, and AVX2 correspond to >> each other and in what ways they differ? Can you please explain your >> understanding to me, so that I see if it's correct or where exactly it >> is wrong. You sound confused pretty badly here. Perhaps not enough >> assembly output reading on your part. ;-) > > To clarify, I don't need a lot of detail from you - e.g., I am not > asking you to list all extra instructions available with one of these > that are not in another (although listing one or two particularly > relevant instructions is OK). I just need a few sentences summarizing the > relationship and main differences between these SIMD instruction sets. my undestranding was that when intrinsic are in SSE2 but AVX is avalialbe they are compiled to AVX, and similarly SSE4 -> AVX2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.