[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHNEV5S-vh90uJNRA722-_3e4vK=GJPuMwtXP95jKvkjqVx-gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:14:12 -0400
From: Mathieu Laprise <mathlaprise@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Default attack format
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Shinnok <admin@...nnok.com> wrote:
>
> Let's implement the core approach for this sprint and add a new feature
> issue on Github for the jumbo approach and assign to the next sprint.
>
> Use magnum's approach , `john -stdin hashfile <<< ""` , if it is the
> minimal overhead one.
All right, I'll do this. As I understand it, the core approach from magnum
works with jumbo too, right ? If this approach works for core and jumbo,
why would we implement in next sprint both approach ?
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
