[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fodnfol5k911mcirk9mep2el.1436718460015@email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:27:40 -0400
From: Alain Espinosa <alainesp@...ta.cu>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: extend SIMD intrinsics
-------- Original message --------
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Date:07/12/2015 10:30 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: [john-dev] extend SIMD intrinsics
...I now think Alain's message suggests we may in fact need to use the
load/store intrinsics. His code is probably multi-threaded, so he must
have been accessing the vectors via pointers. gcc in this case uses
aligned loads; per Alain, apparently Visual C uses unaligned loads.
I use __m128i pointers and static stack allocated __m128i arrays. Both generate unaligned loads. For example this generate an unaligned load and the compiler had all information to use aligned:
void sample_func()
{
__m128i test_array[16];
...
__m128i test_var = test_array[6];
...
}
Regards,
Alain
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
