[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150705133452.GA28792@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 16:34:52 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: more robustness
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 07/05/2015 09:37 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> > If an option like this needs to be introduced, please call it
> > "--fuzz-dump" rather than simply "--dump".
>
> I am not sure it is needed. May be it would be good to prove that an
> error found by --fuzz can also occur in real cracking runs.
> But the name --fuzz-dump would collide with --fuzz, wouldn't it?
I hope the current option parsing code would handle this fine, requiring
that --fuzz be spelled in full. If not, the code needs to be enhanced.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
