[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABtNtWFd5=k-UR-hmV=1Jpd7+KWdSPM+C_tkdT+fopKqGBDQcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:45:44 +0800
From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fuzzing Report on hashes
> An easy option is to try to start with one bogus hash, say, just one
zero digit.
>
> If it gives you 20x speed-up then yes, to should fuzz each format
separately.
> You can try to fuzz them in parallel. I'm not sure how afl will behave in
this?
> case but it's possible that it will work just fine. Another way is to run
formats
> one after another stopping afl after a timeout.
Thanks, I will fuzz some hashes in separately and in parallel. In order to
fuzz faster, I have add 'return' after john_init(), namely not run
john_run().
Should I do this ? Do I keep fuzzing the valid() part ?
Thanks,
Kai
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
