[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150608112929.SBI8T.54594.imail@eastrmwml114>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 11:29:29 -0400
From: <jfoug@....net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fuzzing Report on hashes
---- Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> Thanks! I see that Jim fixed the former, and declared the latter
> invalid (sorry I didn't look into it closer). Thanks, Jim!
I did not add N to the valid() within django scrypt. We might want to look at that. A hash with N > 32 (>=32?) will always fail. It is that way now, but I do not know if that is also the case using the other scrypt code. I did not add the valid check now, but with the change if that one line input file (with the N=41) is run, then john will appear to be doing work, BUT no passwords are ever checked. However, the format will run really fast, lol.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
