[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8300525E-0A5D-425E-A0D0-30EE9BE6AE7A@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 09:03:56 +0800
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Interleaving of intrinsics
> On Jun 6, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com <mailto:solar@...nwall.com>> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:38:18PM +0800, Lei Zhang wrote:
>> Use of intrinsics is counted as function calls, so their run time is included in the '[Others]' row, rather than in SSESHA256body.
>
> Is it merely your guess that specifically "use of intrinsics is counted
> as function calls", or did you actually see them reported as separate
> functions somewhere?
Yes, I did see them.
gcc build:
icc build:
Lei
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Download attachment "PastedGraphic-1.png" of type "image/png" (21695 bytes)
Download attachment "PastedGraphic-2.png" of type "image/png" (18379 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
