[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93bd97f6a30c3f170b82a408daba4d28@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 00:13:36 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Agnieszka's weekly report #4
On 2015-05-25 23:43, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:57:49PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
>> Benchmarking: parallel-opencl, parallel SHA-512 [ ]... DONE
>> Speed for cost 1 (N) of 0
>> Many salts: 45936 c/s real, 4915K c/s virtual
>> Only one salt: 46369 c/s real, 4915K c/s virtual
>
> "parallel SHA-512 [ ]" and "Speed for cost 1 (N)" look weird.
>
> magnum, what's jumbo's current convention on format names (not labels)
> and on algorithm names? What should be reported in this case?
I think you could capitalize format_label to "Parallel-opencl", leave
format_name blank (as long as it's the same as the label bar the -opencl
suffix) and use an algorithm_name of "SHA-512 OpenCL".
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
