[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d895f5a1ba8e1262478cb31a488f294@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:20:36 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: MAYBE_INLINE macro (again)
On 2015-05-13 14:32, Solar Designer wrote:
> magnum -
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:31:24PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> This does not currently affect core as all uses of MAYBE_INLINE is with
>> static functions.
>
> Why don't we limit use of MAYBE_INLINE to static functions in jumbo as well?
Jim suggested this too. The affected functions are
DES_bs_finalize_keys(), MD5_body() and MD5_body_for_thread() (they were
made public because dynamic uses them).
Dropping the inlines, I did a quick check with md5crypt and saw less
than 1% performance regression. I did not check DES yet. Would LM be
affected?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
