[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507110236.GA11248@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 14:02:36 +0300
From: Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: get_binary_*() and get_hash_*() methods
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote:
> Does john always use binary_hash[]() methods before cmp_all()?
Ouch, I meant get_hash[]() here. Sorry!
get_hash[]() should be called for each computed hash, cmp_all()
without get_hash[]() should be called for each loaded hash.
It would be possible to remove get_hash[]() calls if crypt_all
returned the values in array: john provides a pointer to array of ints
(BTW why not unsigned int?) of length MAX_KEYS_PER_CRYPT to
crypt_all(), and crypt_all fills the array with values like from
get_hash[6](). Though the length of array should be a separate field
in the format structure because crypt_all() may produce more
candidates.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
