|
Message-ID: <20150506164109.GA2886@openwall.com> Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 19:41:09 +0300 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: bare tag test works only if the first test hash contains format tag (was: Generic parsing functions -- prototype) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:04:35PM +0300, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: > The code works for good bare hashes. But it will work wrong for > shorter hashes. It fails self tests because $SHA512$ without hex > part is tried: > FAILED (promiscuous valid ($SHA512$)) > > Interestingly format tag is not part of fmt_main, the tag is extracted > from self tests matching $ (so the test will not be applied if the tag > is not in $). I think the check of bare format tag is performed only if the first test hash has the tag. So current raw-sha512 does not get the check. I added printf(" valid(): %s\n", ciphertext); to sha512_common_valid() in rawSHA512_common_plug.c . With the following test vector: static struct fmt_tests tests[] = { {"f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0", "epixoip"}, {FORMAT_TAG "f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0", "epixoip"}, {NULL} }; in rawSHA512_common.h , I don't get the test of bare format tag: Benchmarking: Raw-SHA512 [SHA512 128/128 SSE4.1 2x]... valid(): f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0 valid(): * valid(): f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0 valid(): $SHA512$f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0 With other order of tests static struct fmt_tests sha512_common_tests[] = { {FORMAT_TAG "f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0", "epixoip"}, {"f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0", "epixoip"}, {NULL} }; I get the check Benchmarking: Raw-SHA512 [SHA512 128/128 SSE4.1 2x]... valid(): $SHA512$f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0 valid(): * valid(): $SHA512$f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0 valid(): $SHA512$ valid(): $SHA512$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ valid(): f342aae82952db35b8e02c30115e3deed3d80fdfdadacab336f0ba51ac54e297291fa1d6b201d69a2bd77e2535280f17a54fa1e527abc6e2eddba79ad3be11c0 I think it's a problem. Thanks! -- Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.