[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150425185218.GA21470@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 21:52:18 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC] John the Ripper support for PHC finalists
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 08:41:54PM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
> on well with AVX2 I receive results:
>
> a@...l:~/jtr2/run$ ./john --test --format=pomelo --cost=0:0,0:0
> Will run 8 OpenMP threads
> Benchmarking: POMELO, Generic pomelo [AVX2]... (8xOMP) DONE
> Speed for cost 1 (N) of 0, cost 2 (r) of 0
> Many salts: 1704K c/s real, 213274 c/s virtual
> Only one salt: 1055K c/s real, 132053 c/s virtual
>
> the difference is biggest for 0,0 costs also for 2,0 and 0,2 is a
> difference of 24% and 17%
> at this moment I don't know why this happens
This suggests a bug in the benchmark. Where do the salts for the "many
salts" benchmark come from?
set_key() in pomelo_fmt_plug.c doesn't look like it'd be that slow.
Please investigate.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
